Wednesday, September 24, 2008

THE STATE OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS WHEN IT IS READY TO FORFEIT BELIEF IN THE PERSONAL SELF AND A PERSONAL GOD, Part One

Table of Contents

Today's Considerations
Recent Posts and Archives
Tools for Realization
Author's eBooks
Author's Paperback Books
Free eBooks
An Advaita Vedanta philosophy site, focusing on Realization, enlightenment, nisarga yoga, non-duality / nonduality, your original nature, dwelling as your natural state, and the teachings of Maharaj.

FROM A SITE VISITOR: I’ve read some of your books and a lot of your postings. Somewhere along the way, you said belief in a personal god negates the opportunity for The Understanding to manifest. No argument there, but no complete grasping of the point either. how about some further discussion? Thx Robert

F.: In the previous series, it could have been seen via the responses to Robert's inquiry above that all notions involving ego or ego-states or a sense of "a personal being" or belief in "a personal do-er" or a belief in "a personal god" are all illusions…all mis-perceptions based in delusion. So, how to be free of belief in illusions and to see truth instead?

First, most persons will never be freed from foolish beliefs. When intelligence is neutralized via learned ignorance, then even the intelligent will be fools and will most likely remain fools. When ignorance is combined with learned ignorance, the chances for enlightenment are practically nil. So it is.

Secondly, if the intelligent are to be freed of entrapment in learned ignorance, then all beliefs must be forfeited, without exception, yet who wants to discard the beliefs that most persons prize so highly? The fact is, however, that to discard a thousand beliefs but to cling to even one as if it were your ultimate sacred cow will avail you nothing.

Furthermore, to invite one who believes in a personal self and in a personal god to consider the possibility that their beliefs are pure fiction will only reinforce, not diminish, their attachment to their beliefs. The very invitation itself will usually inspire persons to “dig in their heels” and stubbornly defend what they mistakenly take to be "their" beliefs (which are really others’ beliefs that have merely been passed along to them).

An exception might be a young child that is in the earliest stages of programming. A parent might admit that “the Santa Claus story was a lie, and so was the god story.” The child might want to cling to the belief for selfish purposes (to receive gifts or to gain “power”) but if caught early enough in the programming process, the mere reporting of truth might suffice to free the child of its belief in fiction.

Typically, though, once the programming has extended beyond the age of 7 or 8, beliefs will be taken by persons to be a part of what defines them…that identifies “who they are” as much as the labels that they have been assigned or have adopted on their own.

They will cling forever to their conceptual lies, and only a small fraction will ever be free of the hold of beliefs and thereafter Realize Fully. So blind have persons been made by programming, conditioning, domestication, and enculturation that they cannot begin to fathom the veracity of facts when they hear them.

Should they happen to hear the consciousness speak to say, “Every belief you have is a lie,” most persons will close themselves off from the voice of pure consciousness and cling to the blockages that prevent the consciousness that They Are from hearing itSelf or from hearing facts.

They will refuse to so much as consider the possibility offered by the consciousness when it says, “In fact, you have no beliefs. What you have are ‘their’ beliefs, not yours, yet you have adopted them with such conviction and pride that you behave as if those ideas were original to you.”

This pointer was offered yesterday:

to tell one believing in a personal self that there is no such thing is to only reinforce their belief in a personal self. To tell one believing in a personal god that there is no such thing is to only reinforce their belief in a personal god and will incite them to enter into defensive—and often offensive—modes.

The readiness of the seeker has to be there; only then can the teacher begin her/his task. Dennis Waite put it this way: It is the perennial problem of the teacher to be able to judge where the student currently is in his or her understanding and lead them onwards from there.”

He added, “As ever, in the philosophy of Advaita, the teaching is graded to suit the level of understanding of the student - and it is no use trying to ‘jump levels’ if we have not yet grasped the lower level principles.”

Meaning? Meaning that there are seven steps required to shift from identification with the false "I" to abidance as the Absolute. Meaning that there are three "levels" among seekers and all pointers offered by the teacher must be level appropriate. What is said to one seeker in regards to a topic may differ entirely when addressing the same topic with a different seeker.

Persons at the “wet charcoal” level (which includes the masses) will likely never be able to understand Advaitin pointers (or much of anything else). The teacher will never be able to “fire them up” enough to burn away their learned ignorance.

Those at the “dry charcoal” level include persons who have done some of the work and, with much effort, the teacher might be able to generate a spark of light that can move them closer to The Understanding. For those at the “gunpowder” level, they are very close to Full Realization, being blocked by attachment to only a few remaining concepts.

With the proper pointers offered by a teacher that knows “where they are on the path,” the teacher can often say to those at this third level exactly what is required to trigger an explosion that blows away all of their remaining beliefs and allows them to continue along the “path” in order that Full Realization might happen.

The pointers offered to a recent visitor to the site would not have been offered to those who have not done the level of work that she has obviously completed. Her comments expose the state of the consciousness when the readiness to move to the next level is seemingly in place.

Tomorrow, the specifics of her case will be shared to illustrate what can happen when the teacher sees that one who has been (a) fixated for a time at the third step—the religious / spiritual / personal god step—then (b) contacts a teacher and asks questions as a result of the consciousness awakening to the possibility of “something” beyond that stage.

Visitors to the site tomorrow will see what it is like when the consciousness becomes ready to transcend that phase and continue on with the post-religion, post-spiritual, post-personal god, post-personal self steps of the “journey.”

What about you/You? Have you been fixated at the religious / spiritual / personal god stage? Is the consciousness finally beginning to inspire some questioning? Might the consciousness have reached a level where it is beginning to sense that there might be “something else” to be understood beyond religious dogma and beyond "spiritual principles"? Please enter the silence of contemplation.

Recent Posts and Archives

Tools Used by Other Seekers of Realization

WATCHING an Advaita Vedanta Retreat: Watch a Downloadable computer file version of the Four-Day Advaita Retreat (Downloadable on PC only, not Apple.)

ENROLLING in the Online Advaita Classes For information, visit Information on the Advaita Classes on the Internet To enroll visit Enroll in the Advaita Internet Course

ATTENDING an Advaitin retreat with Floyd and being guided through all seven steps. For details of the retreats offered, please visit the retreat information site.

ARRANGING a one-hour session via Skype or telephone with Floyd. (Skype is a free service.) Click the button to pay and you will be contacted to arrange a date and time for the call.

Five Free eBooks

Compliments of Andy Gugar, Jr.,
the following eBooks are available without charge for you or for friends:

I.
"GOOD vs. EVIL?" or "IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, and INSANITY?"

The content of this eBook deals with one of the most common but erroneous beliefs that the non-Realized masses cling to and which they will fight about (and even kill over), namely, that there is a planet-wide duel going on between “the forces of good and evil” in the universe.

Either (1) the ancient view is spot on: that the "ills of the planet" are rooted in evil people, in people not being religious enough or spiritual enough, and are caused solely by bad morality; or, (2) the "ills of the planet" are rooted in ignorance, stupidity and insanity and "being good" or "being moral" does not put an end to ignorance, does not eliminate stupidity, and does not treat insanity in any way.

II.
"THE VISION"

Comments regarding the free eBook entitled “THE VISION”:

“My thanks to you and Andy.” – Andrew “Mac” McMaster

“Thanks so much for the book! And, by the way, it is brilliant and the most effective pointing that you have done. It has served to help clear the remaining blockages.” – Stan Cross

“Greatly appreciate having “THE VISION” added to my Henderson resource library that is situated on the right side of my bed for easy access! Eternally grateful for what was received and what was given.” – Robert Rigby

“‘THE VISION’ is such a well-written, condensed version of the Nisarga Yoga approach to understanding and enjoying Reality that I feel it can serve as a must-read ‘meditation guide’ for all earnest seekers.” – Andy Gugar, Jr.

III.
"Sapolsky, Maharaj, and the Non-Dual Teachings"

Dr. Robert Maurice Sapolsky is an American neuroendocrinologist; a professor of biology, neuroscience, and neurosurgery at Stanford University; a researcher; an author; and a Research Associate at the National Museums of Kenya.

There is much that a non-dualist or Advaitin or Nisargan can relate to by comparing and contrasting what Sapolsky reveals about the way certain troops of baboons live in Africa with the way that humans abide all around the globe.

This 152-page eBook catalogues the common, non-dual message shared by Sapolsky and Maharaj and reveals the ways that Sapolsky’s scientific research supports the non-dual pointers offered by Maharaj.

IV.
Seeking

In “PART ONE” it will be seen that most persons on the planet are not seeking, and most will never seek, but for those who are seeking, most will face several obstacles:

In “PART TWO” of this book, it will be seen why many criticized Maharaj for “changing his message in his later talks.” It will be seen that the changes were not about changing the message per se as much as about changing his methodology as he experimented with one version of the Ultimate Medicine after another in order to try to find an effective means for addressing the Ultimate Sickness.

He tried a religious version of the Medicine, a Spiritual version of the Medicine, and finally settled on a version which addressed to Sickness at its core . . . at the mental and emotional level.

V.
"THE MOST DANGEROUS BELIEF OF ALL"

“Dangerous” is a term that can only apply during the relative existence, but of those who do commit suicide, for example, how many shoot themselves in the foot over and over until they “bleed out”? None. They shoot themselves in the head. Why? In order to try to stop the noise - to try to stop the chatter of a thousand monkeys – to stop the noisy mind which is the area that stores the ideas, notions, concepts, mind-stuff, etc. which drives them into the depths of insanity.

And what are those ideas, notions, concepts, etc. called, collectively? "Their beliefs." The irony? They are not their beliefs at all. They are the beliefs of “others” that were set in place via programming, conditioning, etc. and which persons then think are their own.

And what are those beliefs rooted in, and what reinforces those beliefs and convinces persons that they are sacred and worth fighting over and even sometimes worth dying for? Blind faith.

This 337-page eBook discusses those issues in detail.

To read any or all of the free eBooks, please double-click the "FREEBIES" link at the top of this page