Wednesday, January 06, 2016

MAHARAJ: “I Talk to You from the Perspective of the Universal Consciousness,” Part Thirty-Eight

Table of Contents

Today's Considerations
Recent Posts and Archives
Tools for Realization
Author's eBooks
Author's Paperback Books
Free eBooks

Today's Considerations

A totally different perspective comes when one becomes able to differentiate between the true and the false and thereafter speaks from the perspective of the universal consciousness; yet among “the truly realized,” that speaking or "sharing" only happens if persons first made clear that they are interested in hearing that consciousness speak.

Here in 1989, a shift began back to the totally pure form of witnessing which had been present during the earliest years of the manifestation of "Floyd" when a full-blown rebellion had taken hold beginning around the age of 4 or so and became firmly fixed by the age of 6 or 7. That rebellion was against (1) the nonsense being heard all around me; and against (2) the nonsense that adults were trying to pass on via nonsensical programming, conditioning, etc.; and against (3) the ignorant and insane concepts being expressed by parents and by the culture and in the church I was being taken to several days a week.

The revolt came when (to use Maharaj’s words) amazingly “ignorant and stupid and insane” statements inspired the questioning of - and then the rejection of belief in - the claims being made by adults all around me. Why, when all of my peers were buying into those claims? Because here - as with almost all Personality Type Fours, including Maharaj - the statements passed on by those in positions of authority were intuitively recognized as being total nonsense, all based in complete and utter impossibilities.

And that is a key point for those who would seek and eventually find: acquiesce to authority and the acceptance of whatever "the authorities" say (without any challenging or defiance at all) requires listeners who are devoid of any proper perspective and who cannot differentiate between "the possible" and "the impossible."  For those who would find, the ability to distinguish between those two must be present.

A few examples of the kinds of things that were heard in a Southern Baptist Church and were challenged at ages 4 to 7 included these:

1. "The first human ever was named 'Adam' who was created by a Creator, and the second was Eve who was created from one of Adam’s ribs and they had two sons, Cain and Abel. Cain was 'the first person ever born on earth' and Abel was 'the first person on earth to die' when Cain killed him, so Cain was also 'the first murderer on earth.' That is how the human race began on earth, and the story is true because it is told in all three of the holy texts that came out of the Middle East, including the Jewish holy text and the Judeo-Christian holy text and the Muslim holy text."  Now while most of my peers nodded in agreement or thought “Whatever . . . who cares?” the perspective here was, “That’s impossible unless incest was on God’s ‘approved sex acts in the garden of Eden’ since Cain would have either had to have sex with his mother in order to begin his own family or with some sister who was born later on.”

2. “We are all God’s children, and He loves us unconditionally.” The perspective here: “That's impossible, because you said that later on - as more and more people inhabited the planet and all except for a man named Noah and his family became evil because they had no faith in God - then God first became angry and then became homicidal and then brought down a flood and killed all of his ‘children’ except for the members of the one family that He approved of. It is impossible for (a) unconditional love of one’s children and (b) a willingness to kill one’s children to co-exist, and that includes being willing to 'sacrifice one's own son' to bring about the forgiveness of all of the sins of all people."

3. “We are all God’s children, and He loves us unconditionally, but if you do not please Him, he will send you to hell where you will burn forever.” It is impossible for a God to love his ‘children’ unconditionally but to be willing to cast them into fire eternally."

4. “Jonah was swallowed by a whale and lived in its stomach for three days but God kept Jonah alive and caused the whale to regurgitate Jonah and he lived.” The perspective here: “That’s impossible, period, end of story (and what a story it is”).

Later, I would use a word that Maharaj often used (though his friends and publishers edited his talks to exclude the word). The word? “Bullshit.” Instead of wasting the breath required for me to say, “That is impossible,” it was easier to simply say, “Bullshit.”

No one can realize – that is, "realize the truth" – without being able to identify BS as BS. It is totally impossible to be realized while being unable to unequivocally differentiate BS from truth, as impossible as it is for a human to become a God (which some Advaitins and some Vedantins and all Mormons and all of those who now think that they are “divine” nevertheless believe).

Thus, this teaching was also questioned and responded to with rejection: 

5. “Eve misled Adam and caused him to lose favor with God, so forever after, all women were cursed with pain during their menstrual cycles, and really bad women have the most painful cycles of all.” The perspective here: “BS. Stop blaming others for your actions. And by the way, science - not religion - explains why menstrual cycles are painful and why some are more painful than others. Get free of the ignorance and insanity that was passed on to you and find facts because only those can lead to finding the truth.” 

So did that clear perspective (which was in place at age 4 and age 5 and which became fully fixed in place by age 6 or age 7) remain intact without interruption from age 4 to the present age of 68? Absolutely not.

The rebellion against the nonsense being passed on (or imposed) by all sorts of authorities went on for years, but eventually – in order to get a job and keep a job – some acquiescence began. Later, for a spell, the desire to try to please a wife and the desire to sustain the false identity of “The Husband” also led to some acquiescence as well. Yet eventually, living any lie began to prey heavily on the underlying inclination toward authenticity (which also comes with the Type Four personality) and that inclination eventually exerted itself and triggered the shift back to the original, early state.

Now, “awakening” and “enlightenment” and "realization" might begin with a flash, with a peripetia, but the one who has been asleep does not reach a state of full physical awakeness instantaneously. As is said of many things, “awakening” is a process, not an event.

Thus, it was in 1989 when the shift back began. The process unfolded continually, not continuously. The same happened with Maharaj. It was a very long process that moved him beyond guru-bhakti and then to bhakti yoga and then to jnana yoga (all with sprinklings of nisarga yoga pointers) and then to using a religious / non-dual version of the Ultimate Medicine and then to using a spiritual / non-dual version of the Ultimate Medicine and then eventually to using a psychologically-based version of the Ultimate Medicine and then finally to a pure Nisargan message. See? With Maharaj, it was a process – a very long process, in fact – not an event and not a single, instantaneous happening.

With Maharaj, an awake-and-aware-and-conscious-and-non-dual version of witnessing moved along through phases. The same happened here. But, in the end, the process allowed in both cases for a clear and accurate and proper perspective to prevail, a perspective which comes only after the complete unblocking of the consciousness happens.

So, to review from yesterday:

In the end, that perspective removed in both cases all beliefs, including the belief in any identity or Identity. Maharaj said that in the beginning he was involved in the business of spirituality and “The Self” and “The love of the Self,” but he said that even that interest eventually ended.

He came to see that at the point of mahasamadhi or the unmanifestation, the elements forming the elemental plant food body shall return to the universal pool of elements; that any remaining air that was being circulated at the point of mahasamadhi will be released into the universal pool of air; and that the manifested conscious-energy shall unmanifest and return to the omnipresent, universal pool of energy.

He understood that there is no birth and no creation so there can be no death and no destruction and no re-birth. He saw that there is no truth to any conceptualized “you” or “You” and that there will be no “one” who will exist post-manifestation. He understood that what is actually happening on this planet is merely a cycling of elements and air and energy. He understood that none of those three could honestly be said to "have value" and "deserve admiration." That was the final perspective there, and it is the perspective here.

Again, if those perspectives manifest, then the assumption of egos can end, the use of egotism to support such false identities can end, and that clear and proper perspective will allow all things relative to be perceived accurately and modestly and reasonably and logically. After that, a respite from having to observe and react can happen, the exhaustion of endless seeking can end, and the joy of abiding naturally can begin.
To be continued.

Please enter into the silence of contemplation.

[NOTE: The four most recent posts follow. You may access all of the posts in this series and in the previous series and several thousand other posts as well by clicking on the links in the "Recent Posts and Archives" section.]

Recent Posts and Archives

Tools Used by Other Seekers of Realization

WATCHING an Advaita Vedanta Retreat: Watch a Downloadable computer file version of the Four-Day Advaita Retreat (Downloadable on PC only, not Apple.)

ENROLLING in the Online Advaita Classes For information, visit Information on the Advaita Classes on the Internet To enroll visit Enroll in the Advaita Internet Course

ATTENDING an Advaitin retreat with Floyd and being guided through all seven steps. For details of the retreats offered, please visit the retreat information site.

ARRANGING a one-hour session via Skype or telephone with Floyd. (Skype is a free service.) Click the button to pay and you will be contacted to arrange a date and time for the call.

eBooks Available at Floyd Henderson's Website

You may click on any of the pictures below for more information on a book or to make a purchase. Within minutes of purchase you can be reading any of the eBooks below on most devices.

Non-Duality Paperback Books on

Five Free eBooks

Compliments of Andy Gugar, Jr.,
the following eBooks are available without charge for you or for friends:


The content of this eBook deals with one of the most common but erroneous beliefs that the non-Realized masses cling to and which they will fight about (and even kill over), namely, that there is a planet-wide duel going on between “the forces of good and evil” in the universe.

Either (1) the ancient view is spot on: that the "ills of the planet" are rooted in evil people, in people not being religious enough or spiritual enough, and are caused solely by bad morality; or, (2) the "ills of the planet" are rooted in ignorance, stupidity and insanity and "being good" or "being moral" does not put an end to ignorance, does not eliminate stupidity, and does not treat insanity in any way.


Comments regarding the free eBook entitled “THE VISION”:

“My thanks to you and Andy.” – Andrew “Mac” McMaster

“Thanks so much for the book! And, by the way, it is brilliant and the most effective pointing that you have done. It has served to help clear the remaining blockages.” – Stan Cross

“Greatly appreciate having “THE VISION” added to my Henderson resource library that is situated on the right side of my bed for easy access! Eternally grateful for what was received and what was given.” – Robert Rigby

“‘THE VISION’ is such a well-written, condensed version of the Nisarga Yoga approach to understanding and enjoying Reality that I feel it can serve as a must-read ‘meditation guide’ for all earnest seekers.” – Andy Gugar, Jr.

"Sapolsky, Maharaj, and the Non-Dual Teachings"

Dr. Robert Maurice Sapolsky is an American neuroendocrinologist; a professor of biology, neuroscience, and neurosurgery at Stanford University; a researcher; an author; and a Research Associate at the National Museums of Kenya.

There is much that a non-dualist or Advaitin or Nisargan can relate to by comparing and contrasting what Sapolsky reveals about the way certain troops of baboons live in Africa with the way that humans abide all around the globe.

This 152-page eBook catalogues the common, non-dual message shared by Sapolsky and Maharaj and reveals the ways that Sapolsky’s scientific research supports the non-dual pointers offered by Maharaj.


In “PART ONE” it will be seen that most persons on the planet are not seeking, and most will never seek, but for those who are seeking, most will face several obstacles:

In “PART TWO” of this book, it will be seen why many criticized Maharaj for “changing his message in his later talks.” It will be seen that the changes were not about changing the message per se as much as about changing his methodology as he experimented with one version of the Ultimate Medicine after another in order to try to find an effective means for addressing the Ultimate Sickness.

He tried a religious version of the Medicine, a Spiritual version of the Medicine, and finally settled on a version which addressed to Sickness at its core . . . at the mental and emotional level.


“Dangerous” is a term that can only apply during the relative existence, but of those who do commit suicide, for example, how many shoot themselves in the foot over and over until they “bleed out”? None. They shoot themselves in the head. Why? In order to try to stop the noise - to try to stop the chatter of a thousand monkeys – to stop the noisy mind which is the area that stores the ideas, notions, concepts, mind-stuff, etc. which drives them into the depths of insanity.

And what are those ideas, notions, concepts, etc. called, collectively? "Their beliefs." The irony? They are not their beliefs at all. They are the beliefs of “others” that were set in place via programming, conditioning, etc. and which persons then think are their own.

And what are those beliefs rooted in, and what reinforces those beliefs and convinces persons that they are sacred and worth fighting over and even sometimes worth dying for? Blind faith.

This 337-page eBook discusses those issues in detail.

To read any or all of the free eBooks, please double-click the "FREEBIES" link at the top of this page