Monday, July 28, 2008

“PROCESSING” UNTIL FULL REALIZATION HAPPENS, Part One

Table of Contents

Today's Considerations
Recent Posts and Archives
Tools for Realization
Author's eBooks
Author's Paperback Books
Free eBooks

An Advaita Vedanta philosophy site, focusing on Realization, enlightenment, nisarga yoga, non-duality (nonduality), your original nature, dwelling as your natural state, and the teachings of Maharaj.

FROM A SITE VISITOR: You witness feelings rise and fall. How long can your feelings last, for example, if you lose a friend? Would the feelings simply rise for a minute, a day, a week, etc.? Where do you draw the line?

F.: Of course, your question deals with relative issues…with “loss,” with “friend,” with “time,” with “memories about the ways things were in ‘the past’ that have an enduring effect now.” The response, then, will have to look first at the manner in which relative issues are processed by relative means.

“Psychological processing” refers to the means by which a person who has become upset or hurt or bothered or enraged is able to (1) consider all aspects of a happening and its “personal effects,” (2) get free of any ensuing anxiety or angry or resentment, and (3) return to a peaceful and stable state.

[NOTE: “Psychological” involves “the mind,” that fiction-filled part of the brain that generates among persons any and all sense of being upset or hurt or bothered or enraged. The natural, original state is peaceful and stable to the degree that no person/persona exists that can experience offense and emotional intoxication. If abiding as the natural state, all of the "relative factors" in this discussion will be moot.]

Obviously, processing is a relative means of dealing with relative issues. Among the Realized (specks of Pure Consciousness) all is merely witnessed—including feelings that rise and fall. If abidance is happening as the natural state, then happenings in the unnatural (relative) state cannot generate periods of agitation, annoyance, or irritability.

[NOTE: Because the cause of all is all, the Realized would not speak of any “appropriate amount of time” for “mourning” any more than a Realized teacher would answer any speculative question such as, “What would you do if this, this or that happened?” What happens, happens, and what happens "in the future" will be caused by all that happens between now and any “future” happening.]

Next, see that agitation, annoyance, or irritability are the providence of persons caught up in a relative existence in which personal attributes are considered real, in which the false perceptions that mark the relative existence are considered actualities, and in which it is only ego-states that can believe they have really been offended.

Until Full Realization happens, processing is required if one would limit to some degree the chaos and vacillations between “being happy” and “being unhappy” that those identified with ego-states will face.

Until Realized, persons must use processing to return to a stable condition after egotism engenders agitation. As far as your question about a time-line—“minutes, days, weeks”—understand this:

Some persons process quickly the perceived threats or offenses that they took to be an actual assault. Other persons take a considerable period of time to process the offenses that ego-states take to be real assaults. And some persons never complete the processing at all.

The latter will experience and re-experience their anger and resentment for the remainder of the manifestation as their “minds” churn over and over again the details of their perceived offenses.

Do you know some persons who have been “wronged” by someone and, years later, still have not gotten over the slights, the offenses, the hurts and then “moved on” (that is, returned to a condition in which they are free of their agitation, annoyance, or irritability)?

The length of time required to process a threat perceived as real by an assumed identity (such as “The Spouse,” for example, an identity which is perceived to be real by that persona), and to see that “What happened is not truly a threat to Me—to the True Self”—and to thereby “let go” is an indicator of either (1) the degree to which one is in touch with reality and the degree to which one is free of egotism or (2) the degree of psychic [mental/”mind”] unhealthiness and the degree to which egotism is in play.

See, therefore, that psychological processing involves (a) taking information received through one of more of the senses and (b) reorganizing it so that a differentiation can be made between what is true and what is false and then (c) being restored to a calm and stable condition.

Next, if the processing continues effectively (again, relatively speaking) then what can follow is at least some temporary level of freedom from the misery and suffering that are generated by the delusion that “It is I—the True Self—that is being interfered with or injured or threatened or assaulted or even destroyed.”

[Only with Full Realization, however, can consistent freedom and stability happen. That occurs when it is seen that “I have not be hurt” and that “It is only ‘the false I’ that is believing it has been hurt.” The seven-step "journey" is moving from identification with that false "I" to abidance as the Absolute.]

If processing happens in a very brief period of time, then there is evidence of a shift toward selflessness…evidence of increasing ego-lessness. Again, the longer it takes a person to process the effects of relative happenings, the greater the evidence of psychic unhealthiness (that is, attachment to “the mind” and its content) and the greater the evidence of egotism.

If the attachment to the offended ego-state continues, then so too shall continue the misery and the restlessness and the hurt and the resentment, all of which can manifest when a false identity takes itself to be real.

Remember the pointer offered before: while the body can register pain, it is “the mind” which registers perceptions (mis-perceptions) of offense and misery and suffering. Please enter the silence of contemplation. (To be continued)

WHILE THE PREFERRED, TRADITIONAL METHOD FOR OFFERING/RECEIVING ADVAITA POINTERS INVOLVES SITTING ONE-ON-ONE WITH A TEACHER, SOME HAVE BEEN ABLE TO COMPLETE THE SEVEN STEPS TO REALIZATION WITH THIS GUIDE:

  • click FROM THE I TO THE ABSOLUTE (A Seven-Step Journey to Reality)
  • Recent Posts and Archives

    Tools Used by Other Seekers of Realization

    WATCHING an Advaita Vedanta Retreat: Watch a Downloadable computer file version of the Four-Day Advaita Retreat (Downloadable on PC only, not Apple.)

    ENROLLING in the Online Advaita Classes For information, visit Information on the Advaita Classes on the Internet To enroll visit Enroll in the Advaita Internet Course

    ATTENDING an Advaitin retreat with Floyd and being guided through all seven steps. For details of the retreats offered, please visit the retreat information site.

    ARRANGING a one-hour session via Skype or telephone with Floyd. (Skype is a free service.) Click the button to pay and you will be contacted to arrange a date and time for the call.

    Five Free eBooks

    Compliments of Andy Gugar, Jr.,
    the following eBooks are available without charge for you or for friends:

    I.
    "GOOD vs. EVIL?" or "IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, and INSANITY?"

    The content of this eBook deals with one of the most common but erroneous beliefs that the non-Realized masses cling to and which they will fight about (and even kill over), namely, that there is a planet-wide duel going on between “the forces of good and evil” in the universe.

    Either (1) the ancient view is spot on: that the "ills of the planet" are rooted in evil people, in people not being religious enough or spiritual enough, and are caused solely by bad morality; or, (2) the "ills of the planet" are rooted in ignorance, stupidity and insanity and "being good" or "being moral" does not put an end to ignorance, does not eliminate stupidity, and does not treat insanity in any way.

    II.
    "THE VISION"

    Comments regarding the free eBook entitled “THE VISION”:

    “My thanks to you and Andy.” – Andrew “Mac” McMaster

    “Thanks so much for the book! And, by the way, it is brilliant and the most effective pointing that you have done. It has served to help clear the remaining blockages.” – Stan Cross

    “Greatly appreciate having “THE VISION” added to my Henderson resource library that is situated on the right side of my bed for easy access! Eternally grateful for what was received and what was given.” – Robert Rigby

    “‘THE VISION’ is such a well-written, condensed version of the Nisarga Yoga approach to understanding and enjoying Reality that I feel it can serve as a must-read ‘meditation guide’ for all earnest seekers.” – Andy Gugar, Jr.

    III.
    "Sapolsky, Maharaj, and the Non-Dual Teachings"

    Dr. Robert Maurice Sapolsky is an American neuroendocrinologist; a professor of biology, neuroscience, and neurosurgery at Stanford University; a researcher; an author; and a Research Associate at the National Museums of Kenya.

    There is much that a non-dualist or Advaitin or Nisargan can relate to by comparing and contrasting what Sapolsky reveals about the way certain troops of baboons live in Africa with the way that humans abide all around the globe.

    This 152-page eBook catalogues the common, non-dual message shared by Sapolsky and Maharaj and reveals the ways that Sapolsky’s scientific research supports the non-dual pointers offered by Maharaj.

    IV.
    Seeking

    In “PART ONE” it will be seen that most persons on the planet are not seeking, and most will never seek, but for those who are seeking, most will face several obstacles:

    In “PART TWO” of this book, it will be seen why many criticized Maharaj for “changing his message in his later talks.” It will be seen that the changes were not about changing the message per se as much as about changing his methodology as he experimented with one version of the Ultimate Medicine after another in order to try to find an effective means for addressing the Ultimate Sickness.

    He tried a religious version of the Medicine, a Spiritual version of the Medicine, and finally settled on a version which addressed to Sickness at its core . . . at the mental and emotional level.

    V.
    "THE MOST DANGEROUS BELIEF OF ALL"

    “Dangerous” is a term that can only apply during the relative existence, but of those who do commit suicide, for example, how many shoot themselves in the foot over and over until they “bleed out”? None. They shoot themselves in the head. Why? In order to try to stop the noise - to try to stop the chatter of a thousand monkeys – to stop the noisy mind which is the area that stores the ideas, notions, concepts, mind-stuff, etc. which drives them into the depths of insanity.

    And what are those ideas, notions, concepts, etc. called, collectively? "Their beliefs." The irony? They are not their beliefs at all. They are the beliefs of “others” that were set in place via programming, conditioning, etc. and which persons then think are their own.

    And what are those beliefs rooted in, and what reinforces those beliefs and convinces persons that they are sacred and worth fighting over and even sometimes worth dying for? Blind faith.

    This 337-page eBook discusses those issues in detail.

    To read any or all of the free eBooks, please double-click the "FREEBIES" link at the top of this page