Monday, June 22, 2015

PART “W”: REALIZING WITHOUT DOGMA, WITHOUT CONTINUOUS SPIRITUAL PRACTICES, AND WITHOUT A PREOCCUPATION WITH “THE NATURE OF REALITY AND THINGS NOUMENAL”

Table of Contents

Today's Considerations
Recent Posts and Archives
Tools for Realization
Author's eBooks
Author's Paperback Books
Free eBooks

Today's Considerations


Maharaj: "Only that person will visit this place whose virtue and sin have come to an end."

In the previous post, there was a discussion of why Maharaj cared not a whit about sin and had nothing to do with those who were occupied with defining sin; nor with those who were obsessed with identifying sinners and then judging and criticizing and ostracizing and shaming them; nor with those who were driven to punish - by mental, emotional, physical, and financial means and, yes, even by death - those who commit whatever is being defined as sin in any given culture at any given moment.

Billions who are preoccupied with sin suggest that even “thinking” about sinning is a sin. See someone you find attractive and then suddenly there manifests a thought about having sex with that man or woman or there even manifests a physical urge to commit adultery with them? That, according to those who consider themselves to be expert on sin, is exactly the same as having actually committed adultery. (The suspicion is that the thought only might feel far less satisfying than the act, but that might - as with all things dualistic - vary from one person to the next.)

Maharaj found that the beliefs held among the masses regarding sin are illogical and incongruous - those beliefs being rooted in duality and judgment and arrogance and hypocrisy and personality identification and being a source of perceived separation as well as a source of fighting and punishing and killing and warmongering.

He certainly held not one single view of sin which aligned with that held by the 97% of the people on the planet who claim to be affiliated with organized religion or by the millions who claim to be spiritual. So what was his atypical take on sin? 

Maharaj: “To take appearance for reality is a grievous sin and the cause of all calamities" (“calamities” defined as “disasters, catastrophes, misfortune, and tragedies").

Of the hypocrisy mentioned above, he said: “Discard all traditional standards. Leave them to the hypocrites. Only what liberates you from desire and fear and wrong ideas is good. As long as you worry about sin and virtue you will have no peace.”

Obviously, sin being one-half of a dualistic pairing, if the concept of sin is to be discarded then so too must the concept of virtue be discarded. The former generates guilt and shame or a sense of separation; the latter generates a plethora of false identities and their accompanying arrogance, conceit, haughtiness, pride, superciliousness, self-importance, and condescension along with a sense of being different from and better than and, therefore, a sense of feeling separate from.

Of the role that personality identification plays in the concept of sin, he said: “Sin and virtue refer to a person only. Without a sinful or virtuous person, what is sin or virtue? At the level of the absolute there are no persons; the ocean of pure awareness is neither virtuous nor sinful. Sin and virtue are invariably relative”

and

“Why do you insist on polluting the impersonal with your ideas of sin and virtue? It just does not apply. The impersonal cannot be described in terms of good and bad. It is Being - Wisdom – Love - all absolute. Where is the scope for sin there? And virtue is only the opposite of sin.”

He added: “. . . The opposite of sin which you call ‘virtue’ is only obedience born out of fear.”

His considering hypocrisy to be insufferable (the display of which would result in one being banned from the loft) came with his understanding that neither sin nor virtue can "exist" without the other. He understood that one is forever mixed up with the other and thus “mixes up” the minds of those who believe in those dualistic concepts.

Of “sins” and “virtues” and of “Sinners” and “Saints,” he said: “It is the mixing up the two that is so disastrous. Nothing can block you so effectively as compromise, for it shows lack of earnestness, without which nothing can be done.”

Consider the point of this exchange:

Q: “Are sin and virtue one and the same?”
M: “These are all man-made values! What are they to me? What ends in happiness is 'virtue', what ends in sorrow is 'sin'. Both are states of mind. Mine is not a state of mind.”

Again, his counsel: “Discard all traditional standards. Leave them to the hypocrites.”

So Maharaj understood that those who are embroiled in the sin-virtue debate and those who consider themselves to be firmly fixed in the virtue camp are the most likely to exhibit the trait of hypocrisy because hypocrisy is forever in the company of its first cousin virtue.

As always, examples and illustrations are offered:

“I am a strong Christian. I strongly believe in God, Jesus, and the Bible. I believe the fact that I’ve accepted Jesus as my savior will be my salvation. In that backroom or whatever it is when God confronts me with my sins, I do not believe any of the kills I had during the war will be among them. Everyone I shot was evil. I had good cause on every shot. They all deserved to die.” The words of Chris Kyle, the most lethal sniper in U.S. military history with 160 kills confirmed by his spotter; Kyle actually claimed 255 kills in Iraq, a nation that the U.S. invaded on false pretext

Speaking last Friday at a political rally organized by a Christian coalition, the Republican candidates running for the office of the President of the United States touted their virtues while citing their "strong Christian principles" and "the role that their virtues and principles will play in their governing style":

Governor Rick Perry: "My faith has guided me for my entire life, and I don't suspect that's going to change.”

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal spoke of having hosted daylong prayer events in his state, as did Perry.

Jeb Bush said that religion has been "an organizing part of my architecture, if you will, as a person and certainly as an elected official."

John Kasich said that his Catholic background pushed him to run for governor. "I got a calling, folks," he said, referring to Bible verses more than once.

Ted Cruz touted his strong, religious, fundamental upbringing.

Former Senator Rick Santorum continued to tout his social conservative agenda, his Catholic beliefs long having been the guiding force behind his political beliefs and actions.  

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee noted that he is a Baptist minister and said that “spiritual convictions should certainly be reflected in one’s worldview, approaches to problems, and perspective.”

Yet all of those who consider themselves to be highly virtuous and who tout their unwavering commitment to Christian principles are all, 100%, in favor of capital punishment. They are all in favor of state governments and the federal government continuing to have and to exercise the right to kill citizens whom they decide should not be allowed to live.

Ironically, those candidates claim to behave properly as a result of always asking this question before taking action: “What Would Jesus Do?”

Indeed. What would Jesus have done with Chris Kyle or those politicians? The answer lies in his past actions:

When Jesus witnessed hypocrites inside the temple, he picked up a whip, walked into the temple, and began beating them, driving them all out onto the street.

And what would Maharaj have done were he to have encountered those persons touting their virtuous beliefs and claiming they render them virtuous? The answer lies in his actions:

When he witnessed hypocrites inside the loft, he tossed them out onto the 10th Lane in Khetwadi. (Those who are so critical of Maharaj for that act should actually be complimenting him for showing far more restraint than did Jesus and for being far kinder than Jesus by not using a whip on those he cast out.)

Maharaj's point: virtue cannot manifest without sin; sin cannot manifest without virtue; and virtue cannot manifest without hypocrisy.

Of possible interest to the student of non-duality: the word “hypocrisy” is derived from the Greek term for “actor” - literally, “one who wears a mask.” In other words, someone who pretends to be what she or he is not.

What could possibly be more at the heart of non-duality than the rejection of acting, the abandonment of the habit of wearing a mask, the termination of pretending to be what one is not, halting the assumption of false identities, and bringing to an end all arrogant claims about one’s virtues?

To be continued.

Please enter the silence of contemplation.

[NOTE: The four most recent posts follow. You may access all of the posts in this series and in the previous series and several thousand other posts as well by clicking on the links in the "Recent Posts and Archives" section.]

Recent Posts and Archives

Tools Used by Other Seekers of Realization

WATCHING an Advaita Vedanta Retreat: Watch a Downloadable computer file version of the Four-Day Advaita Retreat (Downloadable on PC only, not Apple.)

ENROLLING in the Online Advaita Classes For information, visit Information on the Advaita Classes on the Internet To enroll visit Enroll in the Advaita Internet Course

ATTENDING an Advaitin retreat with Floyd and being guided through all seven steps. For details of the retreats offered, please visit the retreat information site.

ARRANGING a one-hour session via Skype or telephone with Floyd. (Skype is a free service.) Click the button to pay and you will be contacted to arrange a date and time for the call.

Five Free eBooks

Compliments of Andy Gugar, Jr.,
the following eBooks are available without charge for you or for friends:

I.
"GOOD vs. EVIL?" or "IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, and INSANITY?"

The content of this eBook deals with one of the most common but erroneous beliefs that the non-Realized masses cling to and which they will fight about (and even kill over), namely, that there is a planet-wide duel going on between “the forces of good and evil” in the universe.

Either (1) the ancient view is spot on: that the "ills of the planet" are rooted in evil people, in people not being religious enough or spiritual enough, and are caused solely by bad morality; or, (2) the "ills of the planet" are rooted in ignorance, stupidity and insanity and "being good" or "being moral" does not put an end to ignorance, does not eliminate stupidity, and does not treat insanity in any way.

II.
"THE VISION"

Comments regarding the free eBook entitled “THE VISION”:

“My thanks to you and Andy.” – Andrew “Mac” McMaster

“Thanks so much for the book! And, by the way, it is brilliant and the most effective pointing that you have done. It has served to help clear the remaining blockages.” – Stan Cross

“Greatly appreciate having “THE VISION” added to my Henderson resource library that is situated on the right side of my bed for easy access! Eternally grateful for what was received and what was given.” – Robert Rigby

“‘THE VISION’ is such a well-written, condensed version of the Nisarga Yoga approach to understanding and enjoying Reality that I feel it can serve as a must-read ‘meditation guide’ for all earnest seekers.” – Andy Gugar, Jr.

III.
"Sapolsky, Maharaj, and the Non-Dual Teachings"

Dr. Robert Maurice Sapolsky is an American neuroendocrinologist; a professor of biology, neuroscience, and neurosurgery at Stanford University; a researcher; an author; and a Research Associate at the National Museums of Kenya.

There is much that a non-dualist or Advaitin or Nisargan can relate to by comparing and contrasting what Sapolsky reveals about the way certain troops of baboons live in Africa with the way that humans abide all around the globe.

This 152-page eBook catalogues the common, non-dual message shared by Sapolsky and Maharaj and reveals the ways that Sapolsky’s scientific research supports the non-dual pointers offered by Maharaj.

IV.
Seeking

In “PART ONE” it will be seen that most persons on the planet are not seeking, and most will never seek, but for those who are seeking, most will face several obstacles:

In “PART TWO” of this book, it will be seen why many criticized Maharaj for “changing his message in his later talks.” It will be seen that the changes were not about changing the message per se as much as about changing his methodology as he experimented with one version of the Ultimate Medicine after another in order to try to find an effective means for addressing the Ultimate Sickness.

He tried a religious version of the Medicine, a Spiritual version of the Medicine, and finally settled on a version which addressed to Sickness at its core . . . at the mental and emotional level.

V.
"THE MOST DANGEROUS BELIEF OF ALL"

“Dangerous” is a term that can only apply during the relative existence, but of those who do commit suicide, for example, how many shoot themselves in the foot over and over until they “bleed out”? None. They shoot themselves in the head. Why? In order to try to stop the noise - to try to stop the chatter of a thousand monkeys – to stop the noisy mind which is the area that stores the ideas, notions, concepts, mind-stuff, etc. which drives them into the depths of insanity.

And what are those ideas, notions, concepts, etc. called, collectively? "Their beliefs." The irony? They are not their beliefs at all. They are the beliefs of “others” that were set in place via programming, conditioning, etc. and which persons then think are their own.

And what are those beliefs rooted in, and what reinforces those beliefs and convinces persons that they are sacred and worth fighting over and even sometimes worth dying for? Blind faith.

This 337-page eBook discusses those issues in detail.

To read any or all of the free eBooks, please double-click the "FREEBIES" link at the top of this page