Tuesday, August 14, 2018

BEING FANATICAL ABOUT APOLOGIZING BUT NOT BEING FANATICAL ABOUT MAKING RESTITUTION, REIMBURSEMENT, REPAYMENT, AND COMPENSATION

Table of Contents

Today's Considerations
Recent Posts and Archives
Tools for Realization
Author's eBooks
Author's Paperback Books
Free eBooks

TODAY'S CONSIDERATIONS

ANNOUNCEMENTS 

1. Following eye surgery, clear focusing has not returned and eye strain results from anything other than a brief exposure to a computer screen; moreover, two follow up procedures must be arranged to "fine tune" the effects of the surgery; hence, the postings will be brief for awhile. 

2. [See the offer following this post for details on how you can watch a retreat on video which includes a detailed discussion of all seven of the steps on the path as used by Maharaj] 

3. Here, with those who are still driven to talk about "God," the "Son of God," the "Holy Spirit," "Buddha," "Krishna," etc., etc., etc., the invitation to them is to view those as verbs, not nouns. See the end of the post for the full meaning and implications of that. 

4. A new video ("Number Ten: Awakening Together Satsang, March 2018") has now been added in the far right column of this page, offering the opportunity to view a recent 2018 satsang session with Floyd being interviewed by Regina and Jacqueline of "The Awakening Together Group." 

To owe an institution money without feeling any need at all to give their money back to them reveals a rather sociopathic mindset. The same applies if a person or persons are owed money without any intention of giving it back to them.

Now admittedly, mindset and money and debt and repayment are all relative issues, yet the refusal to care about restitution, reimbursement, repayment, and compensation are linked to religious and spiritual conditioning. Really? How? We'll see.

Sure, among the 14 million Jews and the 2.4 billion Christians, there is some attention paid to a "commandment" which say "Thou shalt not steal." The remainder among the 97% on planet earth who claim a religious affiliation also hear some talk about not stealing as well. 

Also, there's talk about asking for forgiveness and of apologizing to God for having strayed from the path he / she / it expects one to follow. 

Yet while there is talk about what not to do, there is nothing mention in the key "Commandments" about what one should do, such as returning whatever has been stolen or paying back whatever is owed. 

Almost all acts of colonialism (that is, the act of invading others lands and enslaving the people and stealing their resources) has historically been done by the people in nations who have claimed or still claim to be religious and godly. 

The leaders in such invading nations respond to criticism of their acts of colonialism by explaining that "the people in all those lands are better off for having been exposed to our laws and rules and regulations and values and economic system and our system of government. They should actually thank us." 

So what is the religious link to the refusal to care about restitution, reimbursement, repayment, and compensation? There is a belief system passed along via religious and conditioning which offers a huge emphasis on confessing and apologizing but offers little emphasis to repayment. 

When the armies of God's supposedly "chosen people" wiped out their enemies and collected the spoils of war (thanks to their God, supposedly) there was never any order eventually to give back the spoils.

What is valued among the religious, therefore, is confessing one's wrongdoings to God and asking for forgiveness. Why? Usually to con God so that, post-manifestation, those persons [think they] will be "in favor with God" and, therefore, will receive eternal rewards rather than eternal punishment. If they were not running another scam, this time with God, they would not just say they were sorry but would actually give back the money or things they took.

Over a billion Christians are regularly told by their leaders, "So you cheated on your spouse and you stole from your employer? Okay. Say ten 'Hail Marys' for each. Now go and sin no more." 

What is missing is? (1) "Per God's Commandments, return to the employer all that you stole, with interest" and (2) "As for cheating on your spouse, who knows? You may never be able to correct the potential damage. We'll see what comes of that. Sucks, huh?" and (3) "Per God's Commandments, don't come back until you can tell me what arrangements you've made to make full restitution, reimbursement, repayment, and compensation." 

See? Number 3 is never a part of The Commandments and is never a part of the leaders' demands.

So, via very warped conditioning, the belief becomes, "I'll apologize, I'll say I'm sorry, but as for making restitution, reimbursement, repayment, and compensation, hell I can't afford to do that and no one here is going to make sure I do." 

Thus, the religious link to valuing confession or apologizing is linked to supposedly eternal benefits which can come from those actions, 

but 

giving little or no value to restitution, reimbursement, repayment, and compensation is a product of religious conditioning which emphasizes the former and almost totally neglects the latter.

The tithing / receiving rewards connection is regularly taught and reinforced. (Per some "holy" texts, God will reward people for religious tithing.)

Moreover, what humans truly care about is revealed by what they spend their money on: tithing, trying to escape or cope with booze or drugs or other addictive habits, sex, sports, politicians, military forces and armaments, ad infinitum. Trillions of dollars are spent on those things annually, all of which amount to an attempt in the long run to garner power and control. 

By comparison, how much is spent willingly each year on restitution, reimbursement, repayment, and compensation? Not too much. 

Fanaticism about power and control and self are paramount. Being fanatical about restitution, reimbursement, repayment, and compensation? Not so much.

Want to apologize for things said and done? Stuff it. Want to give back all the money you took? Hand it over, now. 

Relative? Yes, which is all any of us have for now. As for what might be had "later," don't sweat that. No one has ever survived the manifestation and been able to have anything . . . neither reward nor punishment. There is only NOW. 

Maharaj: " A thing focussed in the now is with me, for I am ever present; it is my own reality that I impart to the present event" 

and 

"Past and future are in the mind only — I am now." 

To be continued.
THE NEWEST OFFER: 

Watch an updated seven-hour streaming video of a retreat with Floyd Henderson which can be viewed by anyone with internet access. (In this video, all seven of the steps on "the path" as taught by Maharaj are explained and discussed.) 


If interested; click the button below to pay the fee via PayPal. You will then receive an email which includes the link for you to view the private, unlisted video via an arrangement we have made with YouTube, Inc. You do not have to have a YouTube account to watch this privately streamed video. 

(If you do not receive the link promptly, your computer or email provider may have high filter settings. Check your spam and trash folders because some providers automatically transfer emails containing links to those folders.) 

To access the seven-hour streaming video of a retreat and begin watching right away, click this "Buy Now" button: 

Buy Now 

Please enter into the silence of contemplation. 

[NOTE: The four most recent posts are below. You may access all of the posts in this series and in the previous series and several thousand other posts as well by clicking on the links in the "Recent Posts and Archives" section.] 

In addition to the five non-duality books made available without charge by Andy Gugar, Jr. (see “FREEBIES” above), you can now access nearly 3,300 posts for any topics of interest to you. 

Here, with those who are still driven to talk about "God," the "Son of God," the "Holy Spirit," "Buddha," "Krishna," etc., etc., etc., the invitation to them is to view those as verbs, not nouns. 

THE EXPLANATION 

If looked at as nouns, they point to illusions and are, therefore, a total waste of time to even discuss; if looked at as verbs which are resulting in certain sane but rare behaviors among humanity, then they are worthy of some attention during the relative existence. 

Meaning? There are members of certain groups who say things such as "My concept of God in the past was of a weak God, an absentee God, A Santa Claus-type God, a mean, punishing, vindictive God, etc. Today, I am in close contact with a loving and caring God whom I worship and praise and glorify and give thanks to." 

The reply to that usually goes like this: "If you are in contact with a God that wants to be worshipped and praised and glorified, then you're dealing with someone like yourself - a narcissist - and hanging out with narcissists will never bring an end to your narcissism (that narcissism evidenced by the fact that you think you are "godly"). 

Next, in the phrase 'loving and caring God,' any supposed God that truly had her or his act together would tell you that the totally irrelevant part of that phrase is 'God' and that the only part that is relevant is the "loving and caring" part. 

"That is, a non-narcissistic god / goddess would say, "I care not an iota about being worshipped and praised and glorified by you or anyone else. How arrogant and insecure and needy would I have to be to want that? Forget the man-made, dreamed up noun 'God' and focus on the 'God as a verb' understanding and then go forth and let loving and caring be verbs - not adjectives - and let them generate the act of love and the act of caring and let those actions manifest through you." 

Yeshu'a (Jesus) and Pope John Paul II and Pope Francis were spot on: 

"No one shall ever see 'the kingdom of heaven.' It is within" 

and 

"Heaven and earth shall fade away." 
--Yeshu'a (Jesus) 

and 

"Heaven and hell are not geographic places but are states of mind, nothing more than concepts dreamed up by men." 
--Pope John Paul II 

"There is no hell." 
--Pope Francis, the current pope 
[in an interview with journalist Eugenio Scalfari, 
a writer used by the Pope to issue off the record teachings 
which become a part of the Papal Magisterium] 

Here's 

the direct link to the VIDEO VERSION 

of the "Awakening Together" satsang session with Regina and Jacqueline referenced earlier, 18 MARCH 2018

If preferred, here's 

the direct link to the AUDIO VERSION 

of that session.

Recent Posts and Archives

Tools Used by Other Seekers of Realization

WATCHING an Advaita Vedanta Retreat: Watch a Downloadable computer file version of the Four-Day Advaita Retreat (Downloadable on PC only, not Apple.)

ENROLLING in the Online Advaita Classes For information, visit Information on the Advaita Classes on the Internet To enroll visit Enroll in the Advaita Internet Course

ATTENDING an Advaitin retreat with Floyd and being guided through all seven steps. For details of the retreats offered, please visit the retreat information site.

ARRANGING a one-hour session via Skype or telephone with Floyd. (Skype is a free service.) Click the button to pay and you will be contacted to arrange a date and time for the call.

Five Free eBooks

Compliments of Andy Gugar, Jr.,
the following eBooks are available without charge for you or for friends:

I.
"GOOD vs. EVIL?" or "IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, and INSANITY?"

The content of this eBook deals with one of the most common but erroneous beliefs that the non-Realized masses cling to and which they will fight about (and even kill over), namely, that there is a planet-wide duel going on between “the forces of good and evil” in the universe.

Either (1) the ancient view is spot on: that the "ills of the planet" are rooted in evil people, in people not being religious enough or spiritual enough, and are caused solely by bad morality; or, (2) the "ills of the planet" are rooted in ignorance, stupidity and insanity and "being good" or "being moral" does not put an end to ignorance, does not eliminate stupidity, and does not treat insanity in any way.

II.
"THE VISION"

Comments regarding the free eBook entitled “THE VISION”:

“My thanks to you and Andy.” – Andrew “Mac” McMaster

“Thanks so much for the book! And, by the way, it is brilliant and the most effective pointing that you have done. It has served to help clear the remaining blockages.” – Stan Cross

“Greatly appreciate having “THE VISION” added to my Henderson resource library that is situated on the right side of my bed for easy access! Eternally grateful for what was received and what was given.” – Robert Rigby

“‘THE VISION’ is such a well-written, condensed version of the Nisarga Yoga approach to understanding and enjoying Reality that I feel it can serve as a must-read ‘meditation guide’ for all earnest seekers.” – Andy Gugar, Jr.

III.
"Sapolsky, Maharaj, and the Non-Dual Teachings"

Dr. Robert Maurice Sapolsky is an American neuroendocrinologist; a professor of biology, neuroscience, and neurosurgery at Stanford University; a researcher; an author; and a Research Associate at the National Museums of Kenya.

There is much that a non-dualist or Advaitin or Nisargan can relate to by comparing and contrasting what Sapolsky reveals about the way certain troops of baboons live in Africa with the way that humans abide all around the globe.

This 152-page eBook catalogues the common, non-dual message shared by Sapolsky and Maharaj and reveals the ways that Sapolsky’s scientific research supports the non-dual pointers offered by Maharaj.

IV.
Seeking

In “PART ONE” it will be seen that most persons on the planet are not seeking, and most will never seek, but for those who are seeking, most will face several obstacles:

In “PART TWO” of this book, it will be seen why many criticized Maharaj for “changing his message in his later talks.” It will be seen that the changes were not about changing the message per se as much as about changing his methodology as he experimented with one version of the Ultimate Medicine after another in order to try to find an effective means for addressing the Ultimate Sickness.

He tried a religious version of the Medicine, a Spiritual version of the Medicine, and finally settled on a version which addressed to Sickness at its core . . . at the mental and emotional level.

V.
"THE MOST DANGEROUS BELIEF OF ALL"

“Dangerous” is a term that can only apply during the relative existence, but of those who do commit suicide, for example, how many shoot themselves in the foot over and over until they “bleed out”? None. They shoot themselves in the head. Why? In order to try to stop the noise - to try to stop the chatter of a thousand monkeys – to stop the noisy mind which is the area that stores the ideas, notions, concepts, mind-stuff, etc. which drives them into the depths of insanity.

And what are those ideas, notions, concepts, etc. called, collectively? "Their beliefs." The irony? They are not their beliefs at all. They are the beliefs of “others” that were set in place via programming, conditioning, etc. and which persons then think are their own.

And what are those beliefs rooted in, and what reinforces those beliefs and convinces persons that they are sacred and worth fighting over and even sometimes worth dying for? Blind faith.

This 337-page eBook discusses those issues in detail.

To read any or all of the free eBooks, please double-click the "FREEBIES" link at the top of this page