Thursday, January 19, 2006

THEIR ANGRY “GOD OF PEACE”--Part One

Table of Contents

Today's Considerations
Recent Posts and Archives
Tools for Realization
Author's eBooks
Author's Paperback Books
Free eBooks
From a site visitor in New Orleans, LA, U.S.A.: “I found your blog recently and thank you for the insights you offer. Now, my question: the mayor of our city has announced that the storms which hit the region last year were sent by God out of anger. I find that hard to believe. I only returned recently but I'm already making arrangements to leave permanently. Your thoughts?”

F.: Thanks for the e-mail. Rather than thoughts, how about some considerations that invite persons to be free of the delusions of their magical thinking?

1. Religious people like your mayor claim they turn to their “God” for peace, so how is it that the one they turn to for peace is so often angry himself? (“Himself” is used since your mayor joins the majority in this nation and the world who believe in a god of male gender.)

2. Were all of those in your city (and those along the coast and many miles inland) who lost their homes, their family members, or their own lives the ones who were “the bad ones”? Were the ones who did not lose homes, family members, or their lives “the good ones”? Or when that god’s wrath is provoked by earthings, are “the innocent” as well as “the guilty” all punished or killed equally without discrimination? Consider the duality involved with all those beliefs.

3. This is the same God that for thousands of years has reportedly killed 6000 here, 120,000 there, and finally everyone on earth except one family. By even the most liberal definitions, are the followers of that god not worshipping a mass murderer and an organizer of genocide who killed on a grander scale than Columbus, Hitler and the Europeans who invaded the “Americas,” all combined?

Here’s how that God of Abraham, and the actions of those dedicated to the three religions that are outgrowths of his writings, were addressed in Spiritual Sobriety (Recovering What Religions Lost) http://floydhenderson.com/spiritualsobriety.htm :

On 9/11/2001, a group of Islamic fundamentalists commandeered two commerical airliners and flew them into the World Trade Center Towers in New York City, explaining that Allah had told them to attack the Jewish and Christian infidels influencing the world economy from those buildings. SO THE GOD OF ISLAM WAS FOR ATTACKING THE TOWERS. Fundamentalist Judaeo-Christian minister Jerry Falwell disagreed, explaining that the towers were knocked down as God’s punishment for the proliferation of non-Christians, gays, and feminists in the U.S. SO THE GOD OF JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY WAS FOR ATTACKING THE TOWERS. A Fundamentalist Muslim minister, on the anniversary of the 9/11 attack said that God approved the attack since “if Allah had not wanted the Towers knocked down, they could not have been knocked down.” SO THE GOD OF ISLAM OK’D THE ATTACK ON THE TOWERS THAT KILLED 2800 PEOPLE. A reporter asked the Fundamentalist, Born-Again President George Bush if he had talked with his father (a former president) before attacking Iraq and dropping U.S. bombs on Baghdad. Bush pointed upward and said that he had talked to “The Father.” During that talk between Bush and God, God evidently gave the president the go-ahead to drop bombs on a city and kill thousands of women, children, and men in Iraq. In announcing the beginning of the attack on Iraq to the people of the U.S., Bush invoked God’s blessing on U.S. soldiers and their war effort. SO THE JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN GOD OK’D KILLING IRAQIS.

Is it any wonder that Judaism, Christianity and Islam talk more about their prophets—Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed—than about their god? That is understandable, considering their beliefs about their god’s vengeful behavior. That leads to another consideration for today: “If such a male-god actually exists, and if his followers are right (that he is driven by his anger to kill thousands of people, to anniliate homes and communities, and to destroy families), who would seek to depend on that entity, to be close to that entity, or to believe that he is a source of peace?” WHO has what to gain by suggesting that love and worship that result from threat and intimidation is the way to go? And what kind of god could be so involved in self-deception that he would believe that love and worship offered as a result of threat and intimidation is "true love"? An upcoming post will address why persons are prisoners who actually have no desire at all for independence, but the key pointer for today is that the “journey” to sanity—to being in touch with reality—begins by questioning it all. Please enter into the silence of contemplation. [To be continued]

Recent Posts and Archives

Tools Used by Other Seekers of Realization

WATCHING an Advaita Vedanta Retreat: Watch a Downloadable computer file version of the Four-Day Advaita Retreat (Downloadable on PC only, not Apple.)

ENROLLING in the Online Advaita Classes For information, visit Information on the Advaita Classes on the Internet To enroll visit Enroll in the Advaita Internet Course

ATTENDING an Advaitin retreat with Floyd and being guided through all seven steps. For details of the retreats offered, please visit the retreat information site.

ARRANGING a one-hour session via Skype or telephone with Floyd. (Skype is a free service.) Click the button to pay and you will be contacted to arrange a date and time for the call.

Five Free eBooks

Compliments of Andy Gugar, Jr.,
the following eBooks are available without charge for you or for friends:

I.
"GOOD vs. EVIL?" or "IGNORANCE, STUPIDITY, and INSANITY?"

The content of this eBook deals with one of the most common but erroneous beliefs that the non-Realized masses cling to and which they will fight about (and even kill over), namely, that there is a planet-wide duel going on between “the forces of good and evil” in the universe.

Either (1) the ancient view is spot on: that the "ills of the planet" are rooted in evil people, in people not being religious enough or spiritual enough, and are caused solely by bad morality; or, (2) the "ills of the planet" are rooted in ignorance, stupidity and insanity and "being good" or "being moral" does not put an end to ignorance, does not eliminate stupidity, and does not treat insanity in any way.

II.
"THE VISION"

Comments regarding the free eBook entitled “THE VISION”:

“My thanks to you and Andy.” – Andrew “Mac” McMaster

“Thanks so much for the book! And, by the way, it is brilliant and the most effective pointing that you have done. It has served to help clear the remaining blockages.” – Stan Cross

“Greatly appreciate having “THE VISION” added to my Henderson resource library that is situated on the right side of my bed for easy access! Eternally grateful for what was received and what was given.” – Robert Rigby

“‘THE VISION’ is such a well-written, condensed version of the Nisarga Yoga approach to understanding and enjoying Reality that I feel it can serve as a must-read ‘meditation guide’ for all earnest seekers.” – Andy Gugar, Jr.

III.
"Sapolsky, Maharaj, and the Non-Dual Teachings"

Dr. Robert Maurice Sapolsky is an American neuroendocrinologist; a professor of biology, neuroscience, and neurosurgery at Stanford University; a researcher; an author; and a Research Associate at the National Museums of Kenya.

There is much that a non-dualist or Advaitin or Nisargan can relate to by comparing and contrasting what Sapolsky reveals about the way certain troops of baboons live in Africa with the way that humans abide all around the globe.

This 152-page eBook catalogues the common, non-dual message shared by Sapolsky and Maharaj and reveals the ways that Sapolsky’s scientific research supports the non-dual pointers offered by Maharaj.

IV.
Seeking

In “PART ONE” it will be seen that most persons on the planet are not seeking, and most will never seek, but for those who are seeking, most will face several obstacles:

In “PART TWO” of this book, it will be seen why many criticized Maharaj for “changing his message in his later talks.” It will be seen that the changes were not about changing the message per se as much as about changing his methodology as he experimented with one version of the Ultimate Medicine after another in order to try to find an effective means for addressing the Ultimate Sickness.

He tried a religious version of the Medicine, a Spiritual version of the Medicine, and finally settled on a version which addressed to Sickness at its core . . . at the mental and emotional level.

V.
"THE MOST DANGEROUS BELIEF OF ALL"

“Dangerous” is a term that can only apply during the relative existence, but of those who do commit suicide, for example, how many shoot themselves in the foot over and over until they “bleed out”? None. They shoot themselves in the head. Why? In order to try to stop the noise - to try to stop the chatter of a thousand monkeys – to stop the noisy mind which is the area that stores the ideas, notions, concepts, mind-stuff, etc. which drives them into the depths of insanity.

And what are those ideas, notions, concepts, etc. called, collectively? "Their beliefs." The irony? They are not their beliefs at all. They are the beliefs of “others” that were set in place via programming, conditioning, etc. and which persons then think are their own.

And what are those beliefs rooted in, and what reinforces those beliefs and convinces persons that they are sacred and worth fighting over and even sometimes worth dying for? Blind faith.

This 337-page eBook discusses those issues in detail.

To read any or all of the free eBooks, please double-click the "FREEBIES" link at the top of this page